| |
Home
>
The photovoltaic panels: Different type: photovoltaic in multicrystalline
silicon o monocrystalline and amorphous silicon photovoltaic panels.
Photovoltaic
panels:
The photovoltaic panel, also called a solar
cell is a special type of solar panel that has the capacity
to generate electric current when exposed to sunlight |
|
|
Photovoltaic modules there
are three main types: the features, advantages and drawbacks:
Photovoltaic amorphous
silicon:
The photovoltaic module cheaper, but also with the reduced
efficiency and, unfortunately, also subject to a degradation
of performance over time.
This type of photovoltaic panel looks like a sheet of glass
gray / bluish color uniform, the thickness is a few millimeters
and usually has an aluminum frame to give extra strength
and manageability to the module itself.
In practice, a special glass is coated on one side, with
several steps of the state amorphous silicon and various
other products, in order to create an optimum level of water
resistance and electrical insulation.
The transparent side is what you expose to the sun, while
in the opaque layer of aluminum profiles are set for fixing
the roof. The same side apart from the two wires that carry
the current generated by the solar panel plant.
The voltage produced by each PV module is approximately
24 - 40 Volt and, once connected in parallel with each other,
the various currents add up and are routed to the inverter,
which is an electronic device that converts direct current
generated by panels into alternating current at 220 volts
used in the plant home or for placing on the network Enel
for compensation.
The performance of these photovoltaic panels ranges from
6 to about 10%, but, in the first two months of life, the
yield decreases by about 20%, then remained stable with
a performance degradation that must be guaranteed, and should
not exceed 20% in the first 20 years of operation.
In any case, the power of these modules is calculated by
considering its immediate initial loss of 20%, and then,
during the first months of life, the surrender of power
sold with a panel of 40 watts, in reality is 48 watts, up
actually about 40 W to stabilize after the first months
of operation.
From a standpoint of 'energy
cost for nature', the amorphous silicon photovoltaic panel
is the product that defends better, since, require a relatively
low amount of energy to be produced, can return in a few
years l ' energy that was used to produce it, and can generate
up to 10-12 times more in their lifetime. This is truly
important from a standpoint 'ecological', as it often is
in danger of producing and using products that have consumed
more energy to be produced, than they are able to return,
and this nature may not to please ....
The downside is that unfortunately,
having a low yield compared to other models of solar panels,
install a fairly high (This obviously does not affect the
speech energy cost just done), but still, having a roof
ample the problem is solved, but it also saves cost, since
in practice the cost per watt produced with this technology
is 25-40% lower than other PV technologies.
Another major advantage of amorphous silicon modules is
related to the fact that during the cloudy days, shade,
or in the evening and early morning, you get even higher
yields of 8 and 15% compared to the mono-and poly-crystalline
technology because this technology can take advantage of
these special moments.
It therefore follows that the amorphous silicon solar panels
are particularly suited for areas where often there is the
presence of clouds or physical obstacles that create shadows.
|
|
The amorphous
silicon photovoltaic panels are marketed by us essentially
of two types, differing only in the output voltages: one best
suited to generate electricity to put back into the network
from Enel, and the other is more suitable for building a facility
where l ' Enel you do not get (or do not want more use), such
as country houses or occasional use.
In practice, the photovoltaic panels for interchange with
Enel have higher output voltages (around 42 volts), this to
reduce energy losses, as such loss is inversely proportional
to voltage, while it is proportional to the current, then
the higher voltage and more current is low, which also decreases
the loss of energy.
While photo-voltaic systems for stand-alone (isolated users
or not related to ENEL) work at lower voltages (around 12
volts) because the batteries usually work on these tensions.
These technical devices increase the overall yield of a solar
photovoltaic modules in amorphous silicon, compared to solar
photovoltaic panels monocrystalline or multicrystalline, but
remember that normally the performance of amorphous silicon
photovoltaic panel decreases by about 1% every year, while
the performance of photovoltaic panel monocrystalline or multicrystalline
silicon remains constant for 25 years.
Amorphous silicon photovoltaic
panels can be supplied without a frame of aluminum, useful
option if you want to make a single external frame that
encompasses all the panels, or just to save money, since
the presence of the frame has no effect on performance or
electrical isolation of the module itself.
Attack of the various modules is through the roof for aluminum
in each case on the back of the modules: in fact, the aluminum
frame is useful almost exclusively for aesthetics and to
improve the manageability of the various modules.
Solar Panels in multicrystalline
silicon O MONOCRYSTALLINE:
These two types of photovoltaic modules are aesthetically
as many cells be square or rectangular, side by side under
a pane of glass in a frame of aluminum.
In practice, the solar cell is composed of approximately
30-70 individual photovoltaic cells side by side, electrically
joined through special materials and arrange for one or
more layers of glass in a frame usually made of aluminum,
in order to give the whole a certain toughness, manageability,
and of course isolation from the elements.
The overall performance of
a solar panel monocrystalline silicon is around 13-17%,
while that of a multicrystalline silicon solar panel is
about 12-14%.
So, for the same space compared to amorphous silicon solar
module, you have the yield double or nearly triple, but
the cost per Watt of mono-producible multicrystalline remains
higher.
Besides the fact that, to produce these types of mono-multicrystalline
photovoltaic modules, is spending a lot of energy, so each
module also takes 3-6 years (compared with about 2-3 years
Product amorphous silicon) to return the only power that
was used to be produced, while in their lifetime will produce
4-8 times more, in particular, this problem is the major
failing of the single crystal form.
Another defect of the latter
quite annoying photovoltaic technology, is linked to a substantial
reduction, or even killing performance in the event of shades
that cover a small portion of the form, or in case of clouds,
or during evening hours or early morning.
Fact is, however, these two
types of photovoltaic panels are still very good quality
products and stability of returns, which in fact remains
constant over time and guaranteed, even for 25 years, producing
more energy for the same space occupied optimize space,
perhaps not too exploitable part of the roof which is placed
in the South
|
|
TIPS FOR SHOPPING:
Hoping to have made clear on the differences of various photovoltaic
TECHNOLOGY, let us give the following advice:
recommend the purchase of
monocrystalline or multicrystalline photovoltaic modules
if you have state or regional contributions for the construction
of photovoltaic roofs (10,000 photovoltaic roofs program,
or the like), but normally just because certain parameters
required for stability of performance over a period 20-25
years, and this is practically guarantees only by monocrystalline
or multicrystalline modules.
This advice applies even if you have a roof is not too large,
or you want to minimize the visual impact against the outside
of the solar home, or you want to entrust to a technology
of high quality and durable.
recommend the purchase of
amorphous silicon photovoltaic modules in case we want to
create as little environmental impact with regard to nature,
so try to waste less energy as possible for the production
of photovoltaic modules. In this regard we recall that it
takes years of operation so that a photovoltaic module generate
enough power to compensate for what was used to be produced.
This choice is also suitable if you live in areas where
often there are clouds, mist, or there are buildings or
trees that create shade during the day: in this case the
overall yield is much better with this type of solar installation.
The choice of amorphous silicon photovoltaic panel we feel
is valid even if one wants to reason in this context: constructing
a solar module with amorphous silicon obtained excellent
results for the first 20 years of practice so we have a
good service with fewer costs than the choice of the photovoltaic
panel mono-mutlicristallino. In 20 years of solar photovoltaic
technology is very advanced, mature and above all much cheaper
(we will strive to make it so!) and then consider that when
the plant will decrease the his performance we will have
economic alternatives to replace him with yields much higher.
Finally we quote a remark still important in our view, however,
namely that The technology of household cleaning products
leads to ever more savvy with consumption, so even though
our plant will make 20% less in 20 years, will also true
that our appliances will consume too much less than now,
and then we can cover our electric fabbisgno however with
our solar energy system.
|
|
|
 
|